It is clear that even Paul did not have any
idea of a "virgin birth!"
Take a look at what Paul wrote:
"Concerning his Son Jesus
Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;"
(Romans 1:3 KJV)
As Joe Pesce would say―"Harmonize this!"
Paul deliberately wrote "according to the flesh;" why? Because it was natural of what he spoke.
So much for the "virgin birth" as far as we and Paul are concerned. After all, the person whose writing accounts for two-thirds of the Christian bible knows nothing of a virgin birth! why then, should you believe that myth?
Next thing we know, some moron is going to try to get people to believe that "according to the flesh" does not mean male+female human sexual intercourse.
"Religion consists in a set of things which the average man thinks he believes and wishes he was certain of." -Samuel L. Clemens/Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)