MELCHIZEDEK:
THE KING OF
Hugh Fogelman
Melchizedek, who was this man? The King James Version (KJV) of the
Christian Bible says he was simply the King of Salem.
The New
International Version (NIV) Study Bible explains that "
Hebrew
Scripture tells that he blessed first Abraham and then God. As a result of this
slight, God took the priesthood away from Melchizedek and gave it to Abraham,
to hold for his descendants. The Midrash (the
comments and interpretation of the Torah and Talmud) and the early Christian
Church fathers (Jerome, Quaestiones, etc.) were of
the view that Melchizedek is identical with Shem, son of Noah. This opinion of
course is based on the assumption that there are no gaps in the genealogies of
Genesis 11 as Shem lived 35 years after Abraham's death. However, the name Melchizedek, in this case,
is regarded as a title rather than as an actual name.
Many
Christian fundamentalists who try to find Jesus in every book of the Hebrew
Bible believe that Melchizedek who is mentioned in the Christian version
of Psalm 110:4 was a manifestation of
Jesus in human form, saying "As he
said in another place, Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek"
(Hebrew 5:6; 6:20;7:17 & 21). Paul says "Without father, without mother, without descent having neither
beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he abides a
priest perpetually" (Hebrews 7:3).
Modern
scholarship is divided on the question whether Melchizedek was in fact, a
fellow monotheist as Abram was, or whether he may have been a benevolent pagan
priest who through Abram's interaction became a believer in the one universal
God. Those scholars who view Melchizedek as once being
a pagan, view him as a Canaanite, who worshiped the Canaanite deity El Elyon (who was the chief god of the Canaanite pantheon,
meaning a temple for all the gods). Strange, Webster's Dictionary defines
"Pantheon" as a Christian Church, built by Agrippa in
Melchizedek's
priesthood was a source of numerous post-biblical speculations which were
intensified by the difficult verse found in Psalms 110:4, "The Lord has sworn/and will not repent/ thou art priest
forever/after the manner of Melchizedek.” It is generally believed that the
Melchizedek mentioned here and the one in Genesis is the same.
The
first documents mentioning Melchizedek in various contexts appear from around
the beginning of the Christian era. The earliest is probably the fragmentary
scroll discovered in cave 11 at
In
Christian tradition, in the Epistle to the Hebrews, Melchizedek, the king of
righteousness is described as unique, being both a priest and a king, and
because he is "without father,
without mother, without genealogy"; he is eternal, "having neither beginning of days nor end of
life" (Hebrews 7:2-3). In this
respect Melchizede resembles Jesus, the so-called Son
of God, and this is a type of the savior.
Since
in Christian tradition, Jesus is high priest "after the order of Melchizedek" and not after the order
of Aaron (the first high priest of
To make
Jesus a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek, Christianity had
first of all to make Melchizedek into some kind of a mystery-man. Melchizedek
appears twice in the Hebrew Bible. In Genesis, he is simply called a righteous
king, a king of
The
author of Hebrews tried to add to what was little known about Melchizedek by
guessing that he neither had father nor mother nor descent, neither beginning
of days nor end of life. Wherever the writer got this myth from is his
business, but it is certainly not a biblical fact. Then the writer goes on to
compare Jesus with Melchizedek: "Even
Jesus made a high priest forever after
the order of Melchizedek." (Hebrews 6:20)
What
kind of a comparison is this? According the author of Hebrews Melchizedek had
no mother―Jesus did, Mary. Melchizedek had no
beginning of days―Jesus was born in
Jesus
was a priest? When was he anointed? Only kings, high priests and prophets were
anointed and the ritual of anointing was carried out in a prescribed manner and
required authorization. Saying that the "dove" anointed Jesus cannot
be so. First of all, there was a special recipe for preparing the anointing oil
(Exodus 30:22-38). With what oil was Jesus anointed and was it done according
to the prescribed method (Exodus 29)? Christians believe Jesus was priest,
prophet and king but they cannot find one verse in the Christian Bible that
describes how Jesus was anointed for these three offices.
In
reply to this, Christian fundamentalists will argue that anointing took place
in the house of Simon the leper, when a woman smeared Jesus with a box of
precious ointment (Matthew 26:6-13). But the Torah (God's laws) forbids the
making of the anointing oil by the common people and warns that whosoever makes
it or partakes of its scent will be cut off from his people (Exodus 30:37-38).
Besides,
this so-called anointing in Matthew was not for any type of authority
(Priesthood, Prophet or King). This anointing was, according to Matthew, in
preparation for his burial (Matthew 26:12).
Then a preacher
said to me that God in heaven anointed Jesus.
Again making a statement that cannot be proven.
So what
else is nu??