CHRISTIANITY: THE HIGHER RELIGION?

Yeshurun Kayemet and John Stone

                                                                        
Christians believe that Torah, the Law of Moses, has been abolished in favor of a new, better, higher religion. They claim  that the Torah is bad and gives death, but only their religion gives life.

Even a casual study easily disproves this false  claim of Christianity. Torah came from God, so how can it be cruel or bad? Furthermore, the Torah itself says that it is our life.

“This day, I call upon the heaven and the earth as witnesses [that I have warned] you: I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. You shall choose life, so that you and your offspring will live; 20 To love the Lord your God, to listen to His voice, and to cleave to Him. For that is your life …” (Deuteronomy 30:19-20).

 For a commandment is a candle, and the Torah is light…” (Proverbs 6:23).

"For with me shall your days increase, and they will add to you years of life." (Proverbs 9:11).

So you see, mankind gets life from God directly―one does not need Jesus or Christianity. There is nothing higher than the Torah.

King David says in Psalm 19:

The Torah of God is perfect, it restores the soul.
The testimony of God is trustworthy, it turns simple people wise.
The instructions of God are proper, they make one's heart happy;
The commandment of God is clear, it enlightens the eyes.
The fear of God is pure, and endures forever.
The judgments of God are true, consistently righteous.
They are more desirable than gold, even more than the purest gold!
Sweeter than honey that drips from the honeycombs.

The Torah contains everything that a person needs to restore his soul. It is the most perfect of teachings, and it is complete. It lacks nothing. 

"The Torah of God is perfect, it restores the soul." Really think about what those words say about the Torah. Yet Paul, the real creator of Christianity, hated the Torah and said many nasty things about it.  He had to, to have Gentiles believe in his new religion.

What are some of the New Testament rules that Christianity claims make their religion loftier than Torah Judaism? 

“…If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor…"  (Mat 19.21)

Do Christians sell everything they have and has and give it all to the poor? NO!

By contrast, Torah Judaism does not want people to give away all their assets, because that would make one destitute and dependant upon charity yourself. This would then force others to support them, in essence placing a burden on society. Torah Judaism insists that you not only give charity, but also you must do your share to support yourself and your family as well. Which then is the better and more reasonable Law?

A Christian once said to me that this rule only applies to those who want to be perfect. But Jesus taught that you should be perfect! "
Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). Because if you are not perfect, he says, what reward will you get for what you do (Mat 16:27).

And according to Judaism, you can be perfect serve G-d, even without giving away everything you own. Again I ask, which then is the better and more reasonable Law?

From the inerrant Christian new testament come the words of Jesus--we read:

When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.  Then Jesus said to his disciples, "I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of G-d."  (Matthew 19:22-24)

But is this true? NO!

Everyone truly believes that Abraham,  Isaac,  Jacob,   will all be in The Kingdom.   Were they poor?

Abram had become very wealthy in livestock and in silver and gold.  (Genesis 13:2 )

Abram wasn't just wealthy he was "very wealthy"


Isaac planted crops in that land and the same year reaped a hundredfold, because the L-RD blessed him.  The man became rich, and his wealth continued to grow until he became very wealthy.  He had so many flocks and herds and servants that the Philistines envied him.  (Genesis 26:12-14)

Concerning Jacob:

 Jacob heard that Laban's sons were saying, "Jacob has taken everything our father owned and has gained all this wealth from what belonged to our father." (Genesis 31:1)

Surely all the wealth that Gd took away from our father belongs to us and our children. So do whatever G-d has told you." (Genesis 31:16)

You may say to yourself, "My power and the strength of my hands have produced this wealth for me."  But remember the L-RD your Gd, for it is he who gives you the ability to produce wealth, and so confirms his covenant, which he swore to your forefathers, as it is today.  (Deuteronomy 8:17-18)

Is G-d double minded that HE would give us the ability to produce wealth and then say, because of it, it will be harder to enter into The Kingdom?.  That would be absurd thinking.

It is no wonder that Matthew quotes Jesus as saying that the way to eternal life is narrow and difficult! (Matthew 7:13-14) The Christian way is indeed difficult. The Torah way is obtainable as designed by your Creator Himself.

"Judge not, lest you be judged." And "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." This is why Christians NEVER become judges, right? But they do. Almost every Christian Church has tribunals. The various Christian Churches have tried many people over the past two thousand years, and sentenced many of them to death. Christians have always tended to JUDGE Jews as being devils and evil people often without even meeting any Jews or knowing any personally.

Christianity has never been better than Torah Judaism. When Christianity was first invented it was an alternative to the pagan cultures. Perhaps it was something of an improvement over most of the pagan faiths. It was never better than Judaism, though they would like you to think it was.

The Lubavitcher Rebbe was once asked what God's purpose was in creating Christianity, given the nature of the Christian religion and the ways it's been practiced over the centuries.

His answer was that Christianity gave the non-Jewish world the concept of a moshiach and an eventual redemption.  The fact that 
Christianity got all the details wrong doesn't detract from the fact that   they previously didn't even have the idea in mind. 

The teachings of most Christian denominations today contain some rather horrifying things. For example, The Anglican Articles of Religion state, in Article 13, that when someone who does not believe in Jesus does a good deed he is really performing a sin and not a good deed at all! According to them, all the non-Christian people who have ever given charity, helped a sick person, fed a hungry person, clothed a needy person, prayed to God, or defended the weak, every single one of them will go to everlasting hell, and cannot be "saved."

But the Torah teaches us, "God does not bury the reward of any creature" (Babylonian Talmud: Pesachim 118a; Nazir 23b; Bava Kama 28b; Horyos 10b). Anyone, even an animal, that does a good deed, is rewarded for it.

The Christian bible practically claims to have invented love. It is interesting to note that the Christians like to say that Jews did not and will not accept Jesus because Jews are full of hate and sin. Jesus was a man who said that he would have all his enemies destroyed. Where is the love in that? Indeed, the Catholic Church has been directly responsible for most of the horror and death that has taken place in the past two thousand (2,000) years. And they have the nerve to say Jews are the ones full of hate?

Christianity lays claim to the phrase, "Love your enemies." Yet, as I said above, Christians have been more responsible than anyone else for killing their enemies, and even their friends who slightly disagree with them. If you don't believe this, ask the next Abigensian you meet. I'm willing to bet that unless you are a history buff you have never even heard of the Albigensians. That's because the Christians killed them all out in the twelfth century. You know why they killed them? Because the Albigensians believed that all physical things are inherently evil, so the preached against wealth and physical acts of ritual. Unfortunately for them, the Catholic Church was rich and fat on the wealth of Jews and everyone else they didn't like, and they didn't take too well to people telling them it was wrong to have material goods.  Furthermore, the Catholic Church was offended because the Albigensians were against the wafer and wine sacraments, which is a ritual that the Catholic Church claims literally brings Jesus down from heaven into each Catholic church. So, the Catholic Church simply killed all the Albigensians, showing their Christian love and tolerance.

You might think that the Catholic Church is better about these things today. You'd be mostly wrong. They are not apologetic at all about it. In the Catholic Encyclopedia, I found these words:

The death penalty was, indeed, inflicted too freely on the Albigenses, but it must be remembered that the penal code of the time was considerably more rigorous than ours, and the excesses were sometimes provoked....Pope Innocent III was justified in saying that the Albigenses were "worse than the Saracens"; and still he counselled moderation and disapproved of the selfish policy adopted by Simon of Montfort. What the Church combated was principles that led directly not only to the ruin of Christianity, but to the very extinction of the human race.1

No apology, no contrition, no acknowledgment that the Albigensians had done anything wrong―just the Albigensians deserved it, because they supposedly attempted the "very extinction of the human race

This is just one example. The Catholic Church has been responsible for more acts of hatred than any group ever to exist. Admittedly, they have been around very long, but there are groups who have been around even longer and have not been responsible for such death and destruction. Buddhism existed at least 400 years before Christianity, and they are not known for such wholesale destruction.

The Protestants have been no better.

For example, the Protestant persecution of the Society of Friends, otherwise known as Quakers,  had to escape England  and come to America, Unfortunately they continued to again be persecuted again by Protestants! The first American Protestants had themselves escaped persecution from other Protestants I England, and then turned around and persecuted everyone else who came to America, especially Catholics. This is the love of the Christian churches. This is their "turning the cheek." And it does not end there.

The Lutherans denounced and excluded the reformed Calvinists from salvation. The Calvinists roused up the people against the Lutherans. Zwingli, who started his own Christian sect in Switzerland, complained of Luther's intolerance when Zwingli and his group were the victims. However , Zwingli and his followers tied the Anabaptists in sacks and threw them into the Lake of Zurich! Zwingli, by the way, followed the typical Christian method of spreading his religion by destroying churches and burning monasteries of rival religious sects. It can be argued that he was only responding in kind to the way he and his group were treated, but what about the Christian dictum to love your enemies and forgive them? What about the Torah's Commandment not to take revenge? Oh, but that is the OLD Testament, replaced by the NEW Testament!

C. Johannes Janssen, author of a 16-volume history of Germany during "Reformation" times, quotes the Protestant theologian Meyfart that:

"At Augsburg, in the first half of the year 1528, about 170 Anabaptists of both sexes were either imprisoned or expelled by order of the new-religionist Town Council. Some were . . . burnt through the cheeks with hot irons; many were beheaded; some had their tongues cut out."

So you learn that the Catholics had no monopoly on torturing dissidents.

Protestants do not generally spread around the fact that Martin Luther himself wrote that Jews should be murdered or forcibly converted, and that all the synagogues should be burned down.

And Luther wrote about fellow Christians who did not go to church:

"It is our custom to affright those who . . . fail to attend the preaching; and to threaten them with banishment and the law . . . In the event of their still proving contumacious, to excommunicate them . . . as if they were heathen."

Here are some more choice statements by Martin Luther, the Protestant, the “reformer” of Christianity.

"The Pope and the Cardinals . . . since they are blasphemers, their tongues ought to be torn out through the back of their necks, and nailed to the gallows!"

"It were better that every bishop were murdered . . . than that one soul should be destroyed . . . If they will not hear God's Word . . . what do they better deserve than a strong uprising which will sweep them from the earth? And we would smile did it happen. All who contribute body, goods . . . that the rule of the bishops may be destroyed are God's dear children and true Christians."

And as I mentioned above, the Anglican Church teaches that anyone who does not believe in Jesus and does something good has really done something evil.

How is that a religion of love and tolerance? By contrast, Torah teaches that all righteous, of every religion, go to Heaven. Not only that, but Torah teaches that a Gentile can go to Heaven by keeping only Seven Laws (which mostly they do anyway, today) wheseas Jews have to keep the Commandments of the Torah and their Laws. So actually, according to Torah Judaism it is easier for a Gentile to go to Heaven!

In what way is any branch of Christianity better and more loving than Judaism?

"Turning the other cheek?" "Resist not evil?" Most denominations of Christianity have not kept those teachings in any way, shape or form. Most of those who have claimed to espouse such platforms have turned out to be the worst offenders. Such "high moral" claims are not practical, and no one keeps them. Certainly, if someone robbed you, you would take them to court to try and get your money back.

This has always been the problem with Christianity. They talk a lofty talk. It sounds so holy, and spiritual, and beautiful. Forgive everyone! Love everyone! How sweet. So why has this not worked in practice? Because it can't!  When you are adamant in teaching an unreachable trait, it backfires. History has shown that unattainable and unrealistic ideals are very dangerous.

This was perhaps the source of one of their greatest errors. They thought they could improve on the Torah; they thought they could improve on what G-d Himself taught.

It can't be done. Hashem knows what humans are capable of, and what we are not capable of. And Hashem commanded us according to our ways.

Christian practice is simply NOT higher or better than Hashem's word. It is a lot less practical than Torah Judaism  By contrast, Jewish practice is Hashem's word, and it is entirely practical.

The Torah has everything in it that a person needs to restore his soul. It is the most perfect of teachings, and it is complete. It lacks nothing. It was given directly from G-d to Moses and Israel, for all mankind!

 

NOTES:

1 The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume I, by Robert Appleton Company, 1907, Online Edition Copyright © 1999 by Kevin Knight

 

© 2001-2005 Christianity Revealed. All rights reserved.
The content on this page is produced by Christianity Revealed, and is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Christianity Revealed.
If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with our copyright policy and provide proper attribution to the author and jdstone.org .


RETURN