ALTERED
NEW TESTAMENT: THE “STONING”
Hugh
Fogelman
Can Christians step back a little, and reexamine what they are
reading, their New Testament? Are they really reading what Jesus wanted them to
know? Or are they reading what some men on a mission want them to read?
_________________________
The Abingdon Bible
Commentary1 (pg. 1076) readily admits they have no idea where the story of the
woman caught in adultery (reported in John 8:3-7) came from, saying;
“It is certain that this
story does not belong to this gospel. It breaks the continuity of
_________________________
Jesus stoning the adulteress woman in the Christian NIV (New
International Version) Study Bible says:
The earliest and most
reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have John
John
John 8:1-11 But Jesus went to the
_________________________
The Living Bible admits “most ancient
manuscripts omit John 7:53-8:1-8:11.”
However the publishers of
this bible still have the chutzpah to quote Jesus’ words in red.
_________________________
Christians should follow the methods employed by professional
gamblers. They will:
1. Study and examine all possibilities and odds;
2. Will see who is betting with them and against them,
and
3. Carefully set their money bet.
But what do Christians do? They blindly bet their souls on what they
have been told by mere mortals pushing their new religion; no study, no sincere
search for wisdom, just their “feelings.”
The Christian way will always produce a looser, both in gambling
and in the game of eternal life!
Christians should no doubt be referred to as sheeple since they
act like sheep. This is why their leaders are called shepherds. The sheep, like
Christians, blindly go wherever their leaders tell them.
As Jade Koay wrote: “It
is widely known and acknowledged that the whole incident thingy about ‘Jesus’
saying the words ‘he who is without sin cast the first stone’ never
happened...In fact it was added to our bibles...Even my bible, right down at the
bottom is footnoted as saying that this incident never appeared in the majority
of ancient texts...”
_________________________
The Abingdon Bible
Commentary has a lot to say about the “ascension,” especially to those who
try to read between the lines. For example:
The Ascension (Mark
What? Christians steadfastly claim that the Holy Ghost told Luke
what to write; as well as Mark, Matthew and John? So, the Holy Ghost told Mark and Luke to
write of the ascension and did not tell Matthew, John or Luke anything about it!
Hello Christians!!! THINK! Think for yourselves and stop being sheeple.
One more small point for you to consider. The Abingdon Bible Commentary also says that in “Matthew 28:9-10 An
appearance of Jesus to the woman is recorded only in Matthew; and many modern
interpreters regard it as a late addition.”
What?
Another late addition?
_________________________
Christians who do step back and honestly study Christianity, using
their God given mentality are the ones leaving the Church to become Noachides, or
convert to Judaism, God’s only religion. This reminds me of Mark Twain’s
observation:
"A man is accepted into a church for what he believes and he is
turned out for what he knows."
And to think that Christians are betting their souls on such fiction―how
sad!
FOOTNOTE:
The Abingdon Bible Commentary is used for practical and evangelical
purposes,[ copyright in 1929 by the Abingdon Press, Inc.] says that it “reaches out to the “thoughtful pastors,
intelligent laymen, and teachers in Sunday and Week-Day schools of religious
education.”
Copyright
© 2004, Hugh Fogelman. All rights reserved.